so we(you) can capitalize on the effect that would be swell there has to be a way to make stuff move even better then we see in wzzhsups arrow field (IPD THIS MISSION HAS YOU TWINLING ALL OVERIT)

Iwanna see FROST twinle on GRASS like tweekin in winter long ago. strange sprinlers!! STARs and other shimmer effects. be a scientist

we need like a catalog of SHRINKIES in the archive...you know sht that shrinks to look like something else? MRM this could be you. cuase when multiple impression you see later better (iv'e only got a 15'' wide and a 15'' regular extended $ is Ideal tho. Or big screen but Jesus I want to be able to hurl this plastic sht in the street if I feel the neeed so cost = bare min

PS there is nothing Synchtellegent that you cant program in Qbasic Or Pascal Or C. That's how simple this is.

However I could also show you an exponential nested loop that would take your computer 10 years to solve if you don't sever the permutation at the first redundancy. Oh look Ever combination of songs that equals x amount of time now lets POE (prosses of elimination) the list Order!

( solving HUGE potential is like cutting limbs off a tree.

thing BELL CURVE the greater the increment, the greater the margin of error. THATS WHY DIVIDING into SUB GROUPS produces better more equal and accurate averages. a Giant Limb of calculation can be pruned from the process based oneliminating redundancy.

when program say a huge array like how many of these songs at there present length when combine linearly = this time amount?

a rule like 'no track reuses' can bring the field of possibilities down exponentialee.

program wize... a a variable would have to be able to switch itself off from the variable pool after being calculated to avoid a redundant comparison (for insatand 4+5, 5+4 1+2+3,2+1+3,3+2+1

SO TO KILL THE TREE you would throw OUT UNIQUE ORDERS of a group of variables, AND THEN poe the possibilities out of that AFTER!! see there is no reason to cout leeves over here when the branch you want is over there so...

ok ok SIMPLER WAY TO EXPLAIN

say you have 11 SONGS that you need to put into an ORDER. ther 1 times 2 time 3 all the way to 11 number of possibile orders.

BUT!!! throw out the idea of a start and and END and the exponent drops a level!!!! so we have devided the result by ELEVEN!!! now you progam is 11ish times faster.

BUT HERES THE KICKER!! if you know the location OF ANYTHING

then the possibilities of 6 songs all possibile orders + 5 songs all possible orders IS EXPONENTIALLY SMALLER than the 11(10) progression.

SO!! By understanding this YOUCAN BE A PEO NINJA and solve for answers that Old men need computers to find.

It should be noted that track list orders are EXPONENTIALLY more vast than album + movie combinations, which are only ever about 4500 seconds, or 9000 units, which a monky could do.

deriving a list order is mathematical way more impressive.

anyway I can solve A movie faster than you can think of a combo with or without a machine because the rules are so simple and the patterns are like that of something natural cyclical and limited, like common denomitors and such color wheels. theres only SO MANY RTHMS and the converge on the same cycles like clock work.

and once you notice anything you pretty much know where you are.

Understand That The field is usually errored down to a single line can help you use ERROR WEDGES to locate erro free space WITHOTU a statistical report from the nested loop analaysis of priority data ( please note that rule bases are adjustable, and so am I baby)

-Oh