I am for the collaborative aspects of this game. It's why I come here.

I am with MKC & JER and the others on the "2 squares" are necessary to allow more complicated transitions from one level to the next. Some of the most amazing contributions unfold over 2 or 3 levels.

I dislike the idea of having to grade my peers. That would be a big turn off. I know how let people know if I like what they are doing or not, but I do not want to be forced to VOTE for this artist or that. That seems like utter bullshit.

The idea of the time release is an excellent one, but I would like to suggest a 2 square minimum, with the time release of the third, fourth, etc. I think the 2 square min. is necessary to facilitate the blendiness of the grid. There is a tendency for levels that contain 8 unique articipant contributions to feel unblendy (almost like visual tic tac toe) The ability to do two adjacent squares helps to break up the grid in a more organic way.

In any case, let's keep it collaborative and not restrict things to the point that it is no longer a pleasure.